This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 105–118, doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.10
Figure 1: TEM images for COOH–CNTs (a) before acidic treatment and (b) after acidic treatment.
Figure 2: Different decoration homogeneity using different solvents, methanol (a), ethanol (b), DMF (c) and a...
Figure 3: Different decoration densities for different decoration ratios of 1:1 (a), 1:1.3 (b) and 1:1.5 (c).
Figure 4: High magnification HRTEM images of MWCNTs decorated with Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The inset shows the e...
Figure 5: XPS core level spectra of Fe 2p with a fitting curve for sample C (a), O 1s (b) and C 1s (c) for th...
Figure 6: XRD pattern for Fe2O3 nanoparticles (a) and decorated CNTs with Fe2O3 nanoparticles (b).
Figure 7: Electrical resistance of the samples as a function of time.
Figure 8: Effect of decoration ratio on the gas sensing performance.
Figure 9: TEM images showing nanocluster size (a) after calcination for 15 minutes and 30 minutes for a 1:1.5...
Figure 10: Effect of calcination period on the gas sensing performance.
Figure 11: Effect of layer homogeneity and thickness on the gas sensing performance.
Figure 12: Comparison between gas sensors – performance in both dry and humid conditions.